Salud Mental

Validation of the Clock Drawing Test Scoring Method in older adults with neurocognitive disorder

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Sara G. Aguilar-Navarro
Alberto J. Mimenza-Alvarado
María A. Samudio-Cruz
Francisco J. Hernández-Contreras
Lidia A. Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez
Fátima Ramírez-González
José A. Avila-Funes

Abstract

Introduction. The Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is a widely used instrument for identifying neurocognitive disorders (NCDs) in older adults. However, there is insufficient evidence to determine the best scoring method, since current quantitative methods involve the assignment of numerical values, while qualitative ones do not allow for objectivity in the diagnosis. Parsey and Schmitter-Edgecombe (2011) proposed a scoring scheme which, in addition to providing a score of the patient’s performance, permits error analysis, thereby making it possible to identify potential underlying cognitive difficulties.

Objective. The purpose of this study was to validate the CDT scoring scheme proposed by Parsey and Schmitter-Edgecombe (2011) for screening for NCDs in Mexican older adults.

Method. There were 167 participants: 58 cognitively healthy subjects (CH), 52 with mild neurocognitive disorder (mild-NCD), and 57 with major neurocognitive disorder (major-NCD).The CDT scoring method was compared with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Spanish (MoCA-S). Inter- and intra-observer reliability and construct validity were determined and the sensitivity and specificity of this method were calculated.

Results. The X̄ age was 75 years (SD ± 8 years) and the X̄ educational attainment was 10.7 years (SD ± 5.2 years). Internal reliability was .750, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of .774. The cut-off point for the CDT in mild-NCD was 14 points (sensitivity: 40%, specificity: 70%) and 12 points for major-NCD (sensitivity: 90%, specificity: 95%).The most frequent errors in the CDT were: graphic, conceptual, spatial, and/or planning difficulties.

Discussion and conclusion. This method makes it possibly to quickly and easily explore the cognitive status of the patient. It contains ideal psychometric properties for the detection of patients with major-NCD, in addition to offering the possibility of analyzing performance errors and underlying cognitive difficulties.

Keywords:
Neurocognitive disorder, Clock Test, screening, older adult

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguilar-Navarro, S. G., Mimenza-Alvarado, A. J., Palacios-García, A. A., Samudio-Cruz, A., Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, L. A., & Ávila-Funes, J. A. (2017). Validez y confiabilidad del MoCA (Montreal Cognitive Assessment) para el tamizaje del deterioro cognoscitivo en México. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría, 30(20), 1-7.

Ainslie, N. K., & Murden, R. A. (1993). Effect of Education on the Clock Drawing Dementia Screen in Non-Demented Elderly Persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 41(3), 249-252.

Alzheimer’s Disease International. (2015). World Alzheimer Report 2015. The Global Impact of Dementia: An analysis of prevalence, incidence, cost and trends. Alzheimer’s Disease International, London.

American Psychiatric Association. (2014). Guía de consulta de los criterios diagnósticos del DSM-5: Spanish Edition of the Desk Reference to the Diagnostic Criteria From DSM-5. American Psychiatric Pub.

Blair, M., Kertesz, A., Mcmonagle, P., Davidson, W., & Bodi, N. (2006). Quantitative and qualitative analyses of clock drawing in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12(2), 159-165.

Cacho-Gutiérrez, L., García-García, R., Arcaya-Navarro, J., Vicente-Villardón, J., Lantada-Puebla, N. (1999). Una propuesta de aplicación y puntuación del test del reloj en la enfermedad de Alzheimer. Revista de Neurología, 28(7), 648-55.

Delgado, C., Araneda, A., & Behrens, M. I. (2017). Validación del instrumento Montreal Cognitive Assessment en español en adultos mayores de 60 años. Neurología. doi: 10.1016/j.nrl.2017.01.013

Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189-198.

Freedman, L. & Dexter, L. E. (1991). Visuospatial ability in cortical dementia. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 13(5), 677-690.

Freedman, M. (1994). Clock drawing a neuropsychological analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

He, W., Goodkind, D., & Kowal, P. (2016). An Aging World., Washington, DC: U. S. Government Publishing Office.

Hubbard, E. J., Santini, V., Blankevoort, C. G., Volkers, K. M., Barrup, M. S., Byerly, L., ... Stern, R. A. (2008). Clock drawing performance in cognitively normal elderly. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 23(3), 295-327.

Hughes, C., Berg, L., Danziger, W., Coben, L., & Martin, R. (1982). A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 140(6), 566-572.

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. (2015). Encuesta Intercensal, Tabulados básicos. Ciudad de México: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía.

Katz, S., Downs, T. D., Cash, H. R., & Grotz, R. C. (1970). Progress in development of the Index of A.D.L. The Gerontologist, 1, 20-30.

Kim, H. & Chey, J. (2010). Effects of education, literacy, and dementia on the Clock Drawing Test performance. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 16(6), 1138-1146.

Lawton, M. P. & Brody, E. M. (1969). Assesment of older people: self maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist, 9(3-1), 179-186.

McKhann, G., Drachman, D., Folstein, M., Katzman, R., Price, D., & Stadian, E. (1984). Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Report of the NINCDS-ADRDA work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology, 34(7), 939-944.

Ostrosky, F., Ardila, A., & Rosselli, M. (1999). Evaluación Neuropsicológica breve en Español. NEUROPSI. México: Publingenio.

Parsey, C. M. & Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. (2011). Quantitative and qualitative analyses of the clock drawing test in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease: evaluation of a modified scoring system. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 24(2), 108-118.

Petersen, R. C., Caracciolo, B. C., Brayne, S., Gauthier, V., Jelic, L., & Fratiglioni. (2014). Mild cognitive impairment: a concept in evolution. Journal of Internal Medicine, 275(3), 214-228.

Pinto, E. & Peters, R. (2009). Literature review of the Clock Drawing Test as a tool for cognitive screening. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 27(3), 201-213.

Prince, M., Wimo, A., Guerchet, M., Ali, G. C., Wu, Y. T., & Prina, M. (2015). World alzheimer report 2015: the global impact of dementia. An analysis of prevalence, incidence, cost and trends. London: Alzheimer’s Disease International.

Rouleau, I., Salmon, D. P., Butters, N., Kennedy, C., & McGuire, K. (1992). Quantitative and qualitative analyses of clock drawings in Alzheimer’s and Huntington’s disease. Brain and Cognition, 18(1), 70-87.

Sánchez-Benavides, G., Manero, R. M., Quinones-Ubeda, S., De Sola, S., Quintana, M., & Pena-Casanova, J. (2009). Spanish version of the Bayer Activities of Daily Living scale in mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer disease: discriminant and concurrent validity. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 27(6), 572-578.

Shulman, K. I., Shedletsky, R., & Silver, I. L. (1986). The challenge of time: clockdrawing and cognitive function in the elderly. International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 1(2), 135-140.

Suchy, Y., Lee, J., & Marchand, W. (2013). Aberrant cortico–subcortical functional connectivity among women with por motor control: Toward uncovering the substrate of hyperkinetic perseveration. Neuropsychologia, 51(2013), 2130-2141.

Sunderland, T., Hill, J. L., Mellow, A. M., Lawlor, B. A., Gundersheimer, J., Newhouse, P. A., & Grafman, J. H. (1989). Clock drawing in Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 37(8), 725-729.