Salud Mental

Anthropological algology and bioethics

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Fernando Martinez Pintor

Abstract

The importance of biopsychosocial factors in the genesis and maintenance of disease is increasingly being recognized. Most illnesses should be studied from a multifactorial perspective to facilitate understanding and treating them. Many psychopathological processes involve factors such as loneliness, hopelessness, and lack of social cohesion. As early as the nineteenth century, J.M. Charcot defined those illnesses in which no organic lesion was visible as functional disorders. Today, the anthropological view of illness known as the Heidelberg School provides us with a more global and comprehensible assessment of illness. The anthropological approach is complemented by a bioethical one, a bioethics of daily life which, as a practical science, studies and evaluates the living conditions of individuals, seeking practical solutions and contributing its reflections with deliberation and care. In this paper, we aim to highlight the most important factors that have an impact on illness by providing an anthropological view of illness and bringing bioethics closer to everyday life.
Keywords:
Anthropology, pain management, bioethics, biopsychosocial interventions in health

References

Amrhein, V., Greenland, S., & McShane, B. (2019). Los científicos se levantan contra la significación estadística. Naturaleza, 567, 305-307.

Campolongo, D., Martin, A., Tammaro, M. S., & Torregiani, M. (2015). Niños Medicalizados. VII Congreso Internacional de Investigación y Practica Profesional en Psicología. XXII Jornadas de Investigación. XI Encuentro de Investigadores en Psicología del MERCOSUR. Universidad de Buenos Aires.

Cortina, A. (1986). Ética mínima: Introducción a la filosofía práctica. Madrid, España: Editorial Tecnos.

Engel, G. (1977). The Need for a New Medical Model: A Challenge for Biomedicine. Science, 196(4286), 129-136. doi: 10.1126/SCIENCE.847460

García Baró, M. (2012). Sentir y pensar la vida. Madrid: Editorial Trotta.

Greenland, S., Senn, S. J., Rothman, K. J., Carlin, J. B., Poole, C., Goodman, S. N., & Altman, D. G. (2016). Pruebas estadísticas, valores de P, intervalos de confianza y poder: una guía para malas interpretaciones. Revista Europea de Epidemiología, 31, 337-350. doi: 10.1007/s10654-016-0149-3

Haanes, J. V., Nordin, S., Hillert, L., Witthöft, M., van Kamp, I., van Thriel, C., & Van den Bergh, O. (2020). “Symptoms associated with environmental factors” (SAEF) - Towards a paradigm shift regarding “idiopathic environmental intolerance” and related phenomena. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 131, 109955. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.109955

Kaufmann, J. C. (2021). La entrevista comprensiva. Madrid, España: DADO Ediciones.

Laín Entralgo, P. (1969). El médico y el enfermo. Madrid, España: Editorial Triacastela.

Lipowsky, Z. (1984). What does the Word “psychosomatic” really mean? Psychosomatic Medicine, 46(2), 153-172. doi: 10.1097/00006842-198403000-00007

Lolas, F. (2002). Bioética y Medina (pp. 22-24). Santiago, Chile: Editorial Biblioteca Americana.

Lolas, F. (2022). Dialogicidad, Dolor, Cultura, Bioética. Retrieved from www. semp.org.es

Organización Internacional del Trabajo [OIT], Consejo Internacional de Enfermeras [CIE], Organización Mundial de la Salud [OMS], Internacional de Servicios Públicos [ISP]. (2002). Directrices marco para afrontar la violencia laboral en el sector de la salud. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_dialogue/---sector/documents/publication/wcms_160911.pdf

Sackett, D., Haynes, R., & Tugwell, P. (1994). Epidemiología clínica. Una ciencia básica para la Medicina Clínica. Madrid, España: Editorial Diaz de Santos.

Sánchez González, M. A. (2021). Bioética en ciencias de la salud. Barcelona, España: Editorial Elsevier.

Simpson, G. (1944). Tempo and mode in evolution. New York, USA: Columbia University Press.

Sturm, N., Stolz, R., Schalhorn, F., Valentini, J., Krisam, J., Frick, E., ... Straßner, C. (2021). Self-Efficacy, Social Activity, and Spirituality in the Care of Elderly Patients with Polypharmacy in Germany—A Multicentric Cross-Sectional Study within the HoPES3 Trial. Healthcare, 9(10), 1312. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9101312